##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis pengaruh pengeluaran pendidikan oleh pemerintah daerah terhadap pengeluaran pendidikan oleh rumah tangga menurut kelompok pendapatan. Sumber data utama yang digunakan berasal dari Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) 2007 dan 2014 serta APBD kabupaten/kota. Dengan model tobit, penelitian ini menemukan hasil bahwa peningkatan belanja pemerintah untuk pendidikan dasar berhubungan dengan pengurangan yang signifikan dalam pengeluaran pendidikan dasar oleh rumah tangga di setiap kelompok pendapatan. Menurut jenis pengeluaran, peningkatan pengeluaran pendidikan oleh pemerintah signifikan mengurangi pengeluaran iuran sekolah di semua kelompok pendapatan. Sementara itu, pengurangan pengeluaran untuk peralatan sekolah, transport dan kursus hanya terjadi pada rumah tangga berpendapatan rendah dan menengah.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bank Dunia. (2013). Indonesia: Spending More or Spneding Better, improving education financing in Indonesia. Report No. 73050-ID.
Bank Dunia. (2014). Assessing the Role of the School Operational Grant Program (BOS) in Improving Education Outcomes in In-donesia. Report No: AUS4133.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theo-retical and Empirical Analysis, with Spe-cial Reference to Education. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press (3rd ed. in 1993).
Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1979). An Equilib-rium Theory of the Distribution of In-come and Intergenerational Mobility. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, No. 6, 1153-1189.
Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1986). Human Capi-tal and the Rise and Fall of Families. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 4, No. 3, Part 2: The Family and the Distribution, S1-S39.
Chi, W., & Qian, X. (2015). Human capital in-vestment in children: An empirical study of household child education expenditure in China, 2007 and 2011. China Economic Review 37, 52-65.
Das, J., Dercon, S., Habyarimana, J., Krishnan, P., Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2013). School Inputs, Household Substi-tution, and Test Scores. American Eco-nomic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 29-57.
Deng, Q., & Xue, J. (2014). Multivariate tobit system estimation of education expendi-ture in urban China. The Singapore Eco-nomic Review, Vol 59, No.1, 1450005.
Houtenville, A. J., & Conway, K. S. (2008). Pa-rental Effort, School Resources, and Stu-dent Achievement. The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 43, No. 2, 437-453.
Kim, H.-K. (2001). Is there a crowding-out ef-fect between school expenditure and mother’s child care time? Economics of Education Review 20, 71-80.
Nordblom, K. (2003). Is increased public schooling really a policy for equality? The role of within-the-family education. Jour-nal of Public Economics 87, 1943-1965.
Shi, X. (2012). Does an intra-household flypa-per effect exist? Evidence from the edu-cational fee reduction reform in rural China. Journal of Development Econom-ics 99, 459-473.
Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2006). Demand for education in Turkey: A Tobit analysis of private tutoring expenditures. Economics of Education Review, 25, 303-313.
Todd, P. E., & Wolpin, K. I. (2003). On the Spec-ification and Estimation of the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement. The Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No. 485, F3-F33.
Yuan, C., & Zhang, L. (2015). Public education spending and private substitution in ur-ban China. Journal of Development Eco-nomics 115, 124-139.